Síguenos en Twitter     Síguenos en Facebook     Síguenos en YouTube     Siguenos en Linkedin     Correo Salutsantjoan     Gmail     Dropbox     Instagram     Google Drive     StumbleUpon     StumbleUpon     StumbleUpon     StumbleUpon     StumbleUpon


My photo
FACP. Colegio de médicos de Tarragona Nº 4305520 / fgcapriles@gmail.com




Monday, March 10, 2014

PERC: aplicación y limitaciones


emDocs - March 10, 2014 - By Jason West
"Teaching Points
  • The PERC rule cannot be a substitute for gestalt.
  • Gestalt or some form of risk stratification should be employedfirst before using the PERC rule.
  • The PERC rule should not be used in isolation to rule out PE inpregnant or postpartum patients.
  • It is unclear if patients on beta blockers can be included in the PERC rule, and this significance has yet to be borne out in the data.
  • The meta-analysis pooled negative LR is 0.17, which gives you a maximum pretest probability of about 15% to apply the PERC rule to risk stratify your patient down to the standard risk of 2%. However, your PE prevalence must be 7% or less (essentially aWells < 2) before the PERC rule can be applied to patients presenting to ED with suspected PE in conjunction with clinical judgment to identify patients with a prevalence of PE that is below the 1.8% test threshold proposed by Kline.
  • In high PE prevalence populations (which based on the literature, seem to be in Europe) the PERC score inclusive patients will not be able to have a post-test probability at or below the accepted standard risk level.
  • The only evidence we have about PERC rule-inclusive CT-PE or V/Q positive patients suggests that 56% of those will havepleuritic chest pain, which is not in a validated clinical decision rule despite having a higher OR for PE than hemoptysis and recent immobilization, which are both included in the Wells score."

También te podría interesar:
When de PERC Rule Fails (ALiEM - By Jason West, MD | February 11th, 2014)