Síguenos en Twitter     Síguenos en Facebook     Síguenos en Google+     Síguenos en YouTube     Siguenos en Linkedin     Correo Grupsagessa     Gmail     Yahoo Mail     Dropbox     Instagram     Pinterest     Slack     Google Drive     Reddit     StumbleUpon     Print

SOBRE EL AUTOR **

Mi foto
FACP. Colegio de médicos de Tarragona Nº 4305520 / fgcapriles@gmail.com

WORLD EMERGENCY MEDICINE SOCIETIES

Cranial Nerve VI Palsy Emergency

Buscar en contenido

Contenido:

lunes, 2 de noviembre de 2015

ADJUST-PE

medicalrojak - November 02, 2015 - By Ryan Tee
Should we use an age-adjusted value for D-dimer in patients >50 presenting with SOB, chest pain with normal ECG and CXR and with low-intermediate probability of PE ?
1
My summary is:
  1. There is low prevalence of PE in the population studied (19%). Predictive values in this study may not be applicable in your setting. Unfortunately, no sens, spec or likelihood ratio is provided.
  2. Actually, only 337 of patients had D-dimer value between 500-age adjusted value.
  3. No control group in this study.
  4. Use of 2 different scoring systems and 6 different assays for D-dimer, 
  5. – As seen from the below table, 70% of the patients used mainly 2 types ofassays.For other assays, we don’t know whether including more patients in these assays will result in more missed PE. (i.e are the other assays equivalent or just lucky that the patients didn’t have PE?) 
  6. We need to know the type of assays used in our hospital
  7. The outcome was adjudicated, not confirmed by CTPA. Similarly the cause of death is adjudicated, not confirmed by biopsy.
  8. Most of the elderly patients will get CTPA regardless of D-dimer because they are often at higher risk (immobilization, DVT history, CHF etc). So this study may not change the way you are practising right now."
  9. https://medicalrojak.wordpress.com/2015/11/02/adjust-pe-trial/