Síguenos en Twitter     Síguenos en Facebook     Síguenos en YouTube     Siguenos en Linkedin     Correo Grupsagessa     Gmail     Yahoo Mail     Dropbox     Instagram     Slack     Google Drive     Print     StumbleUpon     StumbleUpon     StumbleUpon     StumbleUpon


Mi foto
FACP. Colegio de médicos de Tarragona Nº 4305520 / fgcapriles@gmail.com


iEM Education Project in 12 Questions (https://iem-student.org/)

Buscar en contenido


lunes, 15 de abril de 2019


R.E.B.E.L.EM - April 15, 2019 - By Salim Rezaie
Ref: Frat JP et al. Non-Invasive Ventilation Versus High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy with Apnoeic Oxygenation for Preoxygenation Before Intubation of Patients with Acute Hypoxaemic Respiratory Failure: A Randomised, Multicentre, Open-Label Trial. Lancet Respir Med 2019. PMID: 30898520

..."Author Conclusion:“In patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure, preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen therapy did not change the risk of severe hypoxaemia. Future research should explore the effect of preoxygenation method in patients with moderate-to-severe hypoxaemia at baseline.” 
Clinical Take Home Point: It’s hard to know what to take away from this study, as the comparisons were far from fair or even optimal. As a matter of fact, we are comparing apples to oranges. In a population of patients with severe shunt physiology we are comparing NIV (increased alveolar recruitment through higher levels of PEEP and no nasal/apneic oxygenation) to HFNC (a lower magnitude of alveolar recruitment with lower levels of PEEP + nasal/apneic oxygenation) during laryngoscopy. Essentially, less than optimal pre-oxygenation (NIV alone) with even worse pre-oxygenation (HFNC alone).
In patients with shunt physiology we must optimize pre-oxygenation by recruiting atelectatic alveoli with the best tools we have available:
  1. Increasing PEEP via BVM + PEEP valve with flush rate oxygen AND
  2. Nasal/Apneic oxygenation"