Síguenos en Twitter     Síguenos en Facebook     Síguenos en YouTube     Siguenos en Linkedin     Correo Grupsagessa     Gmail     Yahoo Mail     Dropbox     Instagram     Slack     Google Drive     Print     StumbleUpon     StumbleUpon     StumbleUpon     StumbleUpon


Mi foto
FACP. Colegio de médicos de Tarragona Nº 4305520 / fgcapriles@gmail.com


iEM Education Project in 12 Questions (https://iem-student.org/)

Buscar en contenido


martes, 4 de junio de 2019

Fluid boluses

PulmCrit (EMCrit)
PulmCrit - June 3, 2019 - By Josh Farkas 
..."Summary:The Bullet:
  • Fluid boluses don’t necessarily provide reliable information about the patient’s hemodynamics (especially if they are provided casually and without precise hemodynamic monitoring).
  • As shown below, the majority of fluid boluses don’t lead to sustained clinical benefit.
  • Risks of fluid bolus therapy include damage to the endothelial glycocalyx and volume overload.
  • Available RCTs involving fluid bolus treatment suggest that it is harmful.
  • Overall, fluid boluses may lead to transient improvements in hemodynamics, which reinforces the practice of providing them. However, a more detailed evaluation of the evidence and physiology suggests that most fluid boluses probably lead to harm.
  • The widely-recommended practice of treating anyone with potential infection and possible “sepsis” with a 30 cc/kg fluid bolus is likely dangerous and not evidence-based."